Agreement in Restraint of Marriage Is Mcq

Facts: “X” enters into an agreement with “Y” in which he agrees not to marry anyone except a person whose name begins with the letter “A” and promises to pay ₹100,000 to “Y” if she (“X”) breaks this agreement. Q.7: An agreement that is not legally enforceable should be: Principle: Marriage limitation agreements are void. Which of the following agreements is/is invalid? 1. Agreement without consideration. 2. Agreement to restrict legal proceedings. 3. Agreement Affected by Fraud. Q.45: – If two or more persons have made a joint promise, in the absence of an express agreement to the contrary, the promisor may force the execution of the entire contract: Q.49: – If an agreement is deemed null and void or if a contract becomes void, any person who has received a benefit from this agreement or contract is: Q.31:- An agreement to restrict the marriage of an important person is: Q.15:- An agreement has been reached with the minor. The agreement is…………………: Q.46:- An agreement to do actions impossible in itself is: Q.29:- Agreements that restrict trade are; Under the provisions of section 26 of the Indian Contract Act 1872, any agreement restricting the marriage of a person other than a minor is void.

In the given situation, X enters into an agreement with Y in which he agrees not to marry anyone other than a person whose name begins with the letter A. This agreement therefore violates the principle given here, therefore the agreement between X and Y is void and cannot be applied by the court. This is the right option. Section 27 of the Indian Contracts Act, 1972 states: “Trade Restriction Agreement, void – Any agreement that prevents any person from engaging in any legal profession, business or business of any kind is void to that extent. Q.4: – An agreement that is legally enforceable at the choice of others or others is: B is the right option. Section 43 allows a promisor to sue one or more of the joint participants who can only be sued with his co-advertisers. It is not a defense against such a lawsuit that all promisers must have been parties. A reasonable period of time for the performance of a contract is a matter – foreign sovereigns or accredited representatives of a foreign state, other common promisors have no right against the defaulting Q.21: – If the consent was caused by a false statement or silence, fraudulent within the meaning of Article 17, but the contract if the party whose consent was so caused, had the means to discover the truth with ordinary care: In mutual promises to do things first that are legal……. and second, doing things that are illegal…………. Q.37: – A and B enter into a contract based on the misconception that a particular debt is excluded by the Indian limitation period: Q.16: – When a minor has entered into a contract for the purchase of necessary items. In such cases: To put the party who suffered a loss in the same position as if the contract had been fulfilled Facts: One morning during breakfast, “X”, the father, casually says to “Y” (X`s son): “I will buy a motorcycle for you when you go through the CLAT”.

To punish the cake that has committed a breach of contract, it must be accepted by a person authorized to accept B is the right option. Each child may sue another for any type of harm he or she has suffered, but under no circumstances may he or she be prosecuted. You have absolute immunity( refer to principles related to infants.). If the applicant prescribes the method of adoption, acceptance Q. Which of the above statements is/is correct? Q.25: – What is common sense for the purpose of contracting the contract: B is the right option. The contract is concluded by A and B, but A has not kept its promise, so it is responsible for all damages caused to B. If one of the bettors makes a performance contribution Q.19: – A, who is indebted to B, the lender of his village, he will grant a new loan on terms that seem unscrupulous. This is referred to as follows: Note the following statements about fraud and false statements: 1. Both make the contract voidable. 2.

Misrepresentation is a tortious plea for damages. Social and economic pressures expose the parties to the following statements: 1. If an infant receives goods or goods by making a false declaration of his age, he may be forced to restore them even if the infant has sold or transformed the goods. 2. There is no legal confiscation against minors. Q.39: – A “conditional contract” is a contract to do or not to do something if an event is secured for such a contract: Q. Choose the correct answer with the code below: The right option is D. Under the Indian Contract Act of 1872, the following persons may enter into a contract. 1. Common sense 2. a big 3.

contractual 4. not disqualified by law Q.10:- To convert a proposal into a promise, the hypothesis must be: Q.33:- A contract is not voidable because it was caused by an error in relation to a law in force in India; but the error in relation to a law that is not in force in India has the same effect as: conditional contracts can be based on the non-occurrence of an uncertain future event within a specified period of time. In such cases, the promisor is required to do or not to do something if the event does not occur within the specified time. A asks B, “Will you buy my cow for $100?” B replies, “I`m going to buy your cow for $100, assuming you buy my parrot for $120” In this case. B is the right option.. .